Quote:
Originally Posted by General Maximus
I dont think the fact that Netgear made thr first one was the issue, it was just a half assed job rushed through without any proper testing.
|
its part of it, netgear is easily the worst brand router I have used, I have seen it across 3 different routers. I agree tho they not normally as bad as the superhub turned out to be but they certianly below par.
---------- Post added at 17:36 ---------- Previous post was at 17:35 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignitionnet
The new device has already been commissioned, manufacturer selected, cash spent on development, etc.
---------- Post added at 09:45 ---------- Previous post was at 09:44 ----------
You may want to ask the relevant people Ben. Or wait a few months for it to hit testing.
|
cue ben, nopanic, masque telling us they kept fully informed of every VM business decision, contracts cant be cancelled etc.
---------- Post added at 17:38 ---------- Previous post was at 17:36 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenMcr
I know exactly what is coming and it's not a 'new' SuperHub. It's the same technical spec as the current one, just from a different supplier
|
that makes it a new superhub. Just because it will look the same externally and (may) have the same feature set it doesnt make it not a new device. Different internals, different firmware its essentially a mark II superhub.