Quote:
Originally Posted by ahardie
What you pay Sky is irrelevant unless you are saying everybody should move to Sky which would make them a total monopoly. I get ESPN thrown in with my xl subscription, so again what you pay is irrelevant. What isn't irrelevant is what Ofcom say, although you seem to think it is, and they say Sky is charging too much for movies and are reselling Sports channels at too high a price.
|
Have I not already said it will be decided in the court ? What do you think a fair price is ? Were did I also say its irrelevant what OFCOM say ? If they reduce the price , I benefit if not I'll still carry on as a Sky sports subscriber so its win win for me whatever.
---------- Post added at 11:02 ---------- Previous post was at 10:38 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lew
It's something the added recently. 3 quid a month for NFL Network over the web. I'd be happy to pay that sub if there were a TiVo app that could access it.
|
I wouldn't be suprised if there was eventually as MLBTV seems to be cropping up on connected TVs , Apple tv etc.