|
Re: Tech Guy did it perfect
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignitionnet
SCDMA is less efficient than ATDMA. 128QAM requires an insane upstream SNR, 64QAM is a challenge for operators to push to let alone another 3dB to cater to 128QAM and after overheads it doesn't actually provide anything more than 64QAM ATDMA.
SCDMA does indeed have a purpose, it is more resilient in the presence of burst noise that ATDMA, however horses for courses. If it were so evidently superior everyone would be doing it. They aren't.
|
Could you please take such discussions to this thread to prevent it being taken any further off topic.Thank you.
__________________
Hell is empty and all the devils are here. Shakespeare..
|