Quote:
Originally Posted by DABhand
You have finally admitted it. The point here is your point is not valid since you cut up a sentence to suit your own point.
|
No. I only quote
relevant bits. There's a big difference.
The whole quote, with the bit I used in bold, was:
Quote:
Originally Posted by DABhand
I have said in the past 1 UK agent is worth 25 of the Indian's. Now lets say 2000 indians are employed, thats 80 UK agents. I would prefer the 80 who understand good English skills and do not follow a check list, do not lie and just don't order you things even when you say no to them.
|
Now, give that my point was that, whether in the UK or Overseas, tech. support people would still use checklists, was the rest of the sentence absolutely essential to understanding my point? No, of course it wasn't. The numbers were irrelevant, the "understand good English" was irrelvant. my comment was only regarding the use of check-lists.
Perhaps I assumed a level of understanding of use of English Language that is beyond you. If so, I apologise.
Quote:
|
If the start of the sentence did not suit it, perhaps the whole sentence in its entirety is not compatible with your point.
|
No. It was just not absolutely necessary to include it.
---------- Post added at 15:20 ---------- Previous post was at 15:19 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Masque
As the are many many variants in the Linux stable that would be doubtful ...
|
Now now. Don't start using logic and common sense on here. You know how it confuses some people
