View Single Post
Old 07-05-2011, 11:30   #27
craigj2k12
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Stafford
Posts: 4,225
craigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appeal
craigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appeal
Re: Virgin Media Internet Security

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nopanic View Post
Did you just agree with me ?
no, i was agreeing with myself, did you say the same as me? you must have agreed with me!

---------- Post added at 12:27 ---------- Previous post was at 12:26 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by roughbeast View Post
I think that is what I was recommending, just to be sure. Why just use a belt when you can wear braces as well? Fdisk / MBR then reformat.
dont forget your tinfoil hat

if you can pm me with a link to any virus/trojan/malware/anything that can survive when you format the hard drive, i will load it onto my computer, just to format it to prove you wrong

---------- Post added at 12:30 ---------- Previous post was at 12:27 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by pip08456 View Post
By recommending Fdisk you are also advocating the use of FAT16/FAT32 rather than the more stable NTFS.
the only reason FAT should be used over NTFS is if you are using Windows 95/98/Me, which you shouldn't be!

besides the fact that FAT is less secure than NTFS in the first place, you would be using an unsupported operating system, with old software not up to date with providing protection against the latest nasties

NTFS also lets you use file compression, and drive read/write speeds are quicker under NTFS
craigj2k12 is offline   Reply With Quote