Thread: Should Virgin Media Throttle p2p traffic?
View Single Post
Old 03-05-2011, 19:08   #169
Sirius
Grumpy Fecker
 
Sirius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Warrington
Age: 66
Services: Every Weekend
Posts: 17,059
Sirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver bling
Sirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver bling
Re: Should Virgin Media Throttle p2p traffic?
Quote:
Originally Posted by carlwaring View Post
Well duh! If you break the rules, all bets are off.


Except not really.


Something which is is completely out of VM's contol and therefore irrelevant to the definition.


I'm not the one arguing that "unlimited" doesn't mean "unlimited".


Indeed. Subject closed. By all means have the last word if you like.
If you want to debate the meaning of life, The universe and unlimited will you start another thread please, This one does not need derailing just so you can try to prove a point that has been debated to death on here and is getting BORING
__________________
The UK is now the regime of Ayatollah Starmer the UK's dictator
Sirius is offline   Reply With Quote