Quote:
Originally Posted by toonlight
Here here, a round of applause for the fellow gentleman 
That's what happens when Microsoft tries make people think they future proofed before hand, why else would you want to use Adblock/adblock plus/adblock add-on in the first place, maybe there's no even matched Micro-rubbish programme that does that? maybe - open source community will always have the upper hand in this area. Good for open source community, more people like Cr**py IE9, more they pay to us well provided FF users/app producers for the ease of a well produced download 
Poor effort I say microsoft, you could have had it in there/yours mind, but out there in the real world, you never do these days....poor effort I say!  Best to avoid IE9 with a big long stick for ones present/future well being; just use another browser beside IE9, like FF, Opera,Chrome & etc it much less problem-matic longterm..just think apps, additions, & all the other bit you got with other broswer software.... now nails down my shutters for incoming storm ahead 
Like my reply/comment... reply in kind good or bad
toonlight  |
I'm confused as to what you are trying to say... You appear to be criticising Microsoft for not providing an ad blocker in IE. Something which, let's face, it, it's not in Microsoft's interest to do. The post to which you replied said about the adblock plug in for IE costing money for IE9, so you reply by saying using another browser (which is a fair choice, I rarely use IE if I can avoid it), but that people pay for Open source software? If Chrysalis was willing to pay for software for another browser, do you not think he would just buy the plug in for IE? After all, it would be a lot less hassle than switching browsers.