View Single Post
Old 30-04-2011, 21:49   #16
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: VM Routing and CloudFlare.com

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrysalis View Post
I respect the need to balance across multiple links but of course one would expect an isp to have enough excess capacity cover a route going down in an outage so the fact VM are routing people over america doesnt sit well with me I'm afraid. Using multiple routes is fine, routing people over america to holland is not. I have only had this kind of routing on an isp before once, guess who the isp was?

.
.
.

ntl

nildram, entanet, aaisp, xilo, easynet, freeserve all manage to avoid it.
It's how routing works - the more complex your links to the outside world the higher the chance of 'sub-optimal' routes being optimal according to the EGP.

ntl's network and in turn VM's have a ton of paths out of the network, loads of full table transits and multiple peering points.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote