Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh
I think the fact the police have charged him means they have proof that he was hit with something other than a trunction ,but conspiracy theorists and cop haters will no doubt call it a vendetta against him for daring to complain against the police
|
As discussed earlier in this very thread there is little or no merit in considering the two issues as interdependant. You saying that you think that he has been charged because they may have proof that he was hit by a missile actually makes you look like a conspiracy theorist.
That said, the subsequent silence on the matter of how the injury was caused is very unusual.
Both parties have had considerable time to make / state the facts as known to them and corroborated by medical evidence (x-rays, surgeons, doctors, paramedics, etc) together with other sources such as camera and phone video footage - yet neither have.
There is also the matter of the IPCC still appealing for witnesses to the incident.