View Single Post
Old 23-04-2011, 16:15   #254
Mr Angry
Inactive
 
Mr Angry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Belfast
Posts: 4,785
Mr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny stars
Mr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny starsMr Angry has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Gay couple claim they were ejected from pub for kissing

Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh View Post
It is a defence ,as stated in the act ,that a person has no reason to believe that someone is likely to be caused harassment,alarm or distress ,in other words ..did not intend offence to anyone .It also has to be noted that to cause distress or harassment by saying something like "i don't like gays" has to be directed to someone ,simply stating an opinion in general cannot cause either .If a person says "i don't like you because you are gay"you may have a point especially if it is said in a threatening manner
Again, Section 5 of the Public Order Act "Harassment, alarm or distress" makes no mention of "intent".

Additionally it is not a defence for a defendant to "state" that he or she had "no reason to believe that someone is likely to be caused harassment,alarm or distress" the defence requires the defendant to prove that to be the case.

"(3)It is a defence for the accused to prove"

As such the opinion of the defendant as to whether his / her statements were insulting or causing distress - whether directed at an individual or not - is irrelevant.
Mr Angry is offline   Reply With Quote