VM could have avoided most of the mud slinging in the superdud fiasco by simply including a modem bridge mode in the original firmware. So why didn't they? Was it stupidity, plain old arrogance or is their a master plan behind it all.
It's apparently already been shown to be a simple fix. Funny how that demonstration brought about a furore to release a bugged firmware that firmly slammmed the door on ssh access.
Anyways why does the bridge mode fix keep getting pushed back and back. Sometime in June now we hear.
I have a nasty feeling that some sort of behavioural advertising scheme is at the root of all this. Maybe a scheme that is impossible to opt out of when stuck with using the superhub. Maybe bridge mode is shelved until a way is figured to implement it on any modem/router combi.
All supposition of course.
