|
Re: Sky sets its lawyers on VM over internet ad campaign
I dunno VM is basically attacking Sky for saying their conn is up to 20mb, funnily enough so does VM >.<
As said by a few Sky peeps will give an estimate I believe on how much you could feasibly get when they see how far you are from the nearest exchange, and they give you a limit per month that is not too excessive, 250gb leaves plenty of room even for those who naughtily download things.
But for VM, its totally random.... They will play the contention card nearly constantly these days... so now their up to 50mb for example with contention happening can be anything at all even a couple of meg, then the traffic management, then the p2p/usenet throttling, then the hidden amount for downloading per month and mostly the poor support, poor technical issues being dealt with (some taking months), poor hardware (superhub), oversubscription and just general poor performance are starting to look like a fairytale.
Overall they have no right to stand there and call another ISP a con when they themselves are the biggest cons out of all ISP's. Im sure some staff of VM will deny this, albeit loyalty or not, but lets be honest whats happened to myself and some others and the lies some come out with on that phone... it's pot calling kettle black time. IMHO.
|