View Single Post
Old 18-04-2011, 22:36   #292
craigj2k12
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Stafford
Posts: 4,225
craigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appeal
craigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appealcraigj2k12 has a bronzed appeal
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrysalis View Post


well after the weekend showed no issues I stayed on pc late today and have done some testing whilst its spiking.

pingtest.net still only showing 3ms jitter but reports packet loss
ssh has a jumping cursor, not that bad but its happening. Also when the cursor is not jumping there is noticeble jitter compared to off peak. So basically my port is struggling on capacity that is supposed to handle uplifted speeds but speeds are not uplifted yet. This also whilst traffic shaped both directions.

My thoughts are and its only a guess, that the vmng300 has a smaller queue size to the UBR and its why we see lower latency on it, but during congestion and/or high local utilisation it behaves different as a result.

I think my service is going to get rough when the speeds get uplifted unless there is another bandwidth upgrade before then for me.

Speedtests are ok but do ramp up slower than usual, stay at max once ramped up.
my graph is similar to yours. It has the usual vm spikey yellow, but with some bits of normality I.e. Low spikes. If the highs and lows were swapped for example if it was mostly low with occasional spikes it would be a far better service
craigj2k12 is offline   Reply With Quote