Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrysalis
Voted no for following reasons.
1 - protocol shaping sucks in general, false positives. plus inspecting traffic resource intensive which itself can cause performance issues.
2 - no differential on light or heavy user, this system treats a heavy http user better than a light p2p user.
3 - useless if an area is congested and no or little p2p usage to throttle.
That doesnt mean I think there should be no congestion management just that I think there is better ways of doing it than protocol shaping.
|
Voted no for the same reasons.
BTW Chrys, You should've received an email from Neil at samknows today. Did you get it?