Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrysalis
well no, it should be treated as is, you dont use a ak47 to kill a fly. your approach is the reason why we have vulnerable people now been turned down.
if you think its a prolific problem then prove it. otherwise it is just your point of view it is prolific. Of course when I say wrongfully turned down by that I also meant those people could wrongfully be counted as fraud depending on how they got turned down. So there will be variations both ways on the figures so best to just go on whats reported.
|
Given that the soft approach has resulted in record claimants of all benefits ..and there are about 50 types of benefit iirc,i think it's time for the ak47
Also it must be considered that the different types of fraud ,such as gyro stops ,working cash in hand ,not declaring hours worked are a lot harder to detect than the more blatant types