View Single Post
Old 03-04-2011, 09:07   #5
mertle
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,134
mertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quads
Re: crack a code for the FBI

had look last night but the issue we dont know the language used and if its english would it not be slightly different. If its american or canadian.

Now saying all this I did find something intriguing to first line whether its correct another matter.

I felt there is significance to the hashes. Found if you put those letters in a anagram generator you actually got words back. But is there signnificant or red herring.

Surely it wont be that simple as these FBI chaps would looked at this first thing. See ALP(N or U) EGLSE it looks like an N by looking at other words.

Two things jump out from the anagram is you get the following

A GLEN SLEPT
ANGEL SLEPT

But the last bit you have SE ERTE or SE ER+E is either maths equation or red herring mispelt T to basically throw the cent.

If it is mispelt is the mispelling of the word SETTEE which would without ON match these anagrams.

Is there then significance why he seperated SE code for ON.

Thats what I come up with whether its right or wrong another matter.
mertle is offline   Reply With Quote