Cable Forum - View Single Post

Chrysalis · 25-03-2011, 10:33

its still my view the superhub's life will be cut short.

it has too many complaints related to mass usage such as the poor wireless and instability. Because of this the future proof will be somewhat mooted, especially when you consider although it supports 8 channels, if it can barely handle 300-400mbit of lan traffic then it will likely struggle with 200mbit of wan traffic. When I monitored the cpu usage on my superhub on a 30mbit speedtest it was quite high usage.

all we established here in this thread so far is that technically its possible to use the vmng300 on the current incarnation of 100mbit (over 4 channels) and that VM have a policy in place to only supply 100mbit using superhub equipment. What is not yet established is if pip's deal with retentions will be carried out or if he has been fobbed off.

25-03-2011, 10:33	#113
Chrysalis cf.mega poster Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 12,048	Re: Vmng300 its still my view the superhub's life will be cut short. it has too many complaints related to mass usage such as the poor wireless and instability. Because of this the future proof will be somewhat mooted, especially when you consider although it supports 8 channels, if it can barely handle 300-400mbit of lan traffic then it will likely struggle with 200mbit of wan traffic. When I monitored the cpu usage on my superhub on a 30mbit speedtest it was quite high usage. all we established here in this thread so far is that technically its possible to use the vmng300 on the current incarnation of 100mbit (over 4 channels) and that VM have a policy in place to only supply 100mbit using superhub equipment. What is not yet established is if pip's deal with retentions will be carried out or if he has been fobbed off.