View Single Post
Old 20-03-2011, 14:29   #152
Tezcatlipoca
Inactive
 
Tezcatlipoca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 16,760
Tezcatlipoca has a pair of shiny starsTezcatlipoca has a pair of shiny starsTezcatlipoca has a pair of shiny starsTezcatlipoca has a pair of shiny starsTezcatlipoca has a pair of shiny stars
Tezcatlipoca has a pair of shiny starsTezcatlipoca has a pair of shiny starsTezcatlipoca has a pair of shiny starsTezcatlipoca has a pair of shiny starsTezcatlipoca has a pair of shiny starsTezcatlipoca has a pair of shiny stars
Re: [Update] Allied Forces taking Immediate military action in Libya

Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien View Post
Really don't understand why this intervention is unpopular.

We are going in with the full backing of the UN. Member states keep committing resources and we're going in to stop people being murdered by their own government, they asked us to do so...
I'm not opposed to it at all - unlike Iraq, the Libyan action has a clear & immediate need, has international support, and has explicit legal backing from the UN.

But, as mentioned by others in this thread, I think it is an example of Western hypocrisy... and that perhaps is why some people are critical.

We only intervene if something is in our own interests, not simply for ethical reasons.

Zimbabwe? No oil, so we don't care.

Bahrain? Crucial ally, so all we do is say "Please don't do that", while the regime brings in troops from its neighbours to crush the protests and kill civilians.

etc. etc. etc.

I'm not saying we should be gallivanting around bombing everywhere, but I can easily see why people have issues with our selective interventions.
Tezcatlipoca is offline   Reply With Quote