Quote:
Originally Posted by alwaysabear
So would I, only a short time ago I paid £10 a month for NASN.
|
It's horses for courses, I agree with you that you get what you pay for.
People simply cannot expect a mirror of Sky's HD services, particularly where ESPN is concerned when it costs considerably more to Sky customers.
My gripe with VM was that they do not give you the choice, you get what they deem as cost effective to be bundled in XL which is great value but it is completely inflexible and (in my opinion) can never satisfy the appetite for HD that many people have. It dosen't add up to my mind.
If you want more you have to pay more, it's as simple as that.