View Single Post
Old 16-03-2011, 05:07   #209
BenMcr
Inactive
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Manchester
Services: 360 x2, Maxit TV, Sky Sports and Sky Cinema. Gig1
Posts: 17,929
BenMcr has a pair of shiny starsBenMcr has a pair of shiny starsBenMcr has a pair of shiny starsBenMcr has a pair of shiny stars
BenMcr has a pair of shiny starsBenMcr has a pair of shiny stars
Re: VM finally post news on bridge mode - superhub

Quote:
Originally Posted by pip08456 View Post
Now to answer Ben, you keep coming out with different PDF files for different modem/routers to try to explain why the SH is what it is!

The SH is what it is, is purely and simply because that is what VM asked for. There are those who have already SSH'ed into it and found many parts of the GUI disabled etc.( they still exist in the firmware/software, just turned off.).

VM got what they asked for!
I know VM got what they asked for - they asked for a Hub from Netgear. Why do people keep on thinking I'm saying stuff I'm not?

What I was trying to point out, is that Netgear Gateways don't seem to have a pure bridge mode. As the two PDFs seem to indicate, they have 'Disable NAT' instead which puts them into a 'classic router' mode.

From how I understand this to work, if Virgin just enabled this, it would still leave the public IP on the SuperHub, and then people would have to start messing around with static IP addressess on the LAN side. Which isn't exactly a user friendly option

However, what I thought everyone wanted (and as far as I understand it what Virgin are going to deliver), was the public IP to be on whatever equipment was connected to the SuperHub, be it your own router or whatever else. In effect making it act like a standlone modem.

Based on the PDFs, current Netgear gateways (be it ADSL or Cable) can't do this
BenMcr is offline   Reply With Quote