View Single Post
Old 14-03-2011, 22:35   #8
muppetman11
Inactive
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 12,313
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Is HD on with Virgin more expensive than SKY?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chad View Post
Totally agree. Over a 12 month period SKY edge it for value. Over 24 months Virgin are the winners by a saving of £29.00.
Hard to judge over 24 months most companies give you retention deals after 12 months if you consider leaving.

---------- Post added at 21:35 ---------- Previous post was at 21:34 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lew View Post
Firstly, it doesn't seem to be a Sky-bashing thread. It's just comparing what's available and at what price.

Secondly, if you hate them then it's quite simple, don't click on them.
I'm not having a go at Chad , but they are pointless because what works for one person , may not work for another.
muppetman11 is offline   Reply With Quote