Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Why are you so sure of that? The OP is equally sure that he paid VM for the V+ that is in his possession. He even says he has paperwork to prove it.
The OP may well be misunderstanding what that £35 entitles him to, but I don't see anything here so far that justifies you claiming that the thread does not make sense.
|
Sorry perhaps my English was not good. The part that does not make sense is that there has never been a £5 charge for V+ that could be waived by paying a one-off charge.
Those that claim they have bought a V+ are indeed misunderstanding and, although many say they have documented proof, no-one has ever come up with this proof when asked to provide it as corroboration on fora such as this.