View Single Post
Old 10-03-2011, 10:59   #55
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Cutting pay for the Police - what next

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuart View Post
I suppose technically it's the government's job to manage the state which is supposedly there to look after those who need it.
Purely a safety net though - the idea of being 'looked after' by the government doesn't appeal, it's their job to be there when you can't look after yourself, any other expectation is, to my mind, inappropriate. Maybe I'm a bit too libertarian in that regard

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuart View Post
You are right, the Government's primary income is from us. As such, when they waste money, it's our money.
It's basically all from us. Something people often forget when they talk about companies paying tax is that these companies make money from their customers, and eventually the customers are us most of the time, either directly or through our purchases of other items relying on them.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote