View Single Post
Old 09-03-2011, 18:20   #23
Gary L
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 16,324
Gary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny star
Gary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny star
Re: More smoking restrictions (is it enough?)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris View Post
Actually I think balancing the need to eliminate smoking with the recognition that a lot of people are already addicted to it is quite important. Simply banning it would be irresponsible.
They know people are addicted to the drug. but why can't they alleviate some of the stress and show some compassion by making them cheaper?

irresponsible?
not really. these people are addicts. addicts through the allowing of the product to be sold to them in the first place.

Quote:
It is more important to have a generation of people growing up who have chosen not to smoke in the first place.
Let them pay more then?
Gary L is offline   Reply With Quote