Thread: vmng300 cable modem - 50mb question
View Single Post
Old 04-03-2011, 19:33   #83
zekeisaszekedoes
Permanently Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hampshire, UK
Age: 42
Services: 30Mb Broadband (XL), 2TB TiVo (M+), Samsung Galaxy Ace (M), POTS Landline (M).
Posts: 823
zekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond reputezekeisaszekedoes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: vmng300 cable modem - 50mb question
Quote:
Originally Posted by Masque View Post
Part of the reason they are no longer issuing VMNG300 modems is due to it not being able to channel bond in the same way as the Superhub.
I appreciate you taking the time to give me some insight into the way things work at VM.

I know the VMNG300 could be considered a stopgap solution, and that the Super Hub is meant to be able to handle 400Mbps or so. But since I'm looking to go for 30Mbps upgrade or maybe 50Mbps it would be fine until the Super Hub has more stability and a reliable bridge mode.

My contention is, what do VM lose by adding one to the account of particularly troublesome customers such as myself as both a goodwill gesture and a way to shut 'em up when they have spare inventory? A little bending of the rules for this sort of reason is good PR, reflecting well on VM.
zekeisaszekedoes is offline   Reply With Quote