View Single Post
Old 03-03-2011, 16:57   #1838
alwaysabear
RIp Sweetness
 
alwaysabear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,393
alwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appeal
alwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appeal
Re: Coming Soon to Virgin TV (2011) Vol. I.

Quote:
Originally Posted by muppetman11 View Post
I would go along with that and I watch ESPN a lot. If the £24.50 XL got me say another 7 or 8 HD channels I would gladly pay £9.00 for ESPN so long as ESPNA HD was included like on Sky.
I would agree to that.

---------- Post added at 16:57 ---------- Previous post was at 16:50 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by mersey70 View Post
If you think about it logically why should a premium sports channel be included in XL, it's basically forcing it on you whether you like it or not.

And forcing you to pay for it too as we know it isn't free.

It just seems very inflexible given they are saying they cannot afford certain general HD channels which is surely what the XL pack should be all about. I would guess ESPN must get at least a few quid each month off every XL customer.

Just my opinion though.
Up to about 18 months ago I paid £10 a month for NASN (now ESPN America) so that makes sence if we can get as many general HD channels on the XL package.
alwaysabear is offline