Quote:
Originally Posted by alwaysabear
When it is released to the public in April we will possibly get an unbiased review. It would be nice if it were done by Cnet, Trusted reviews or the like.
|
indeed. for the ones who aren't sure, they are best waiting for reviews, although a few have been done already by the media.
http://reviews.cnet.co.uk/tv-recorde...view-50001852/
http://boomnews.info/in-depth-hands-...y-tivo-review/
http://www.pocket-lint.com/news/3706...o-box-unveiled
---------- Post added at 12:24 ---------- Previous post was at 12:23 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rattus
Not me.. I wanted HD the day it was released. I've not watched DVD in 2 years, refuse to watch them not. Only watch Blu-ray or my old trusty HD-DVDs.
If anyone said HD wasn't that important it was VM with its sluggish implementation of it. There were tonnes of people who wanted more HD.
Now if you had said "people say that about 3D" then i'd agree with you.
Having said that i think the way HD is being implemented is a total con. There is no need for HD channels, just upgrade all channels to HD. If people have SD sets the box just downsamples to output SD resolutions..
Why don't they do that?Because they want to have "NEW" channels to make it look they are giving us something. Oh and want to be able to charge extra for it.
*Not specifically directed at VM as sky is most guilty.
|
The STB still needs to be HD though.
---------- Post added at 12:25 ---------- Previous post was at 12:24 ----------
there is a customer review on DS
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/forums/s....php?t=1440254