View Single Post
Old 19-02-2011, 09:36   #8
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: IPv4 blocks owned by virgin media for consumer use

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
I'd respectfully offer that some of those IP's are not assigned to VM.

E.g. 89.127.224.0/23, 94.199.232.0/23, 194.35.72.0/24 and 158.234.251.0/24
I would fully agree - those are just the prefixes that VM were advertising via BGP so some won't be theirs.

That query took about 30 seconds - I'm not going to spend any longer than that on supplying such information so as to filter the advertisements

---------- Post added at 10:36 ---------- Previous post was at 10:33 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nopanic View Post
Genuine question but why do you care which ranges are VM owned?
I was wondering when someone would ask 'why'.

Maybe he's going to advertise those prefixes himself null routed and kill your services from some sources?
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote