Cable Forum - View Single Post

qasdfdsaq · 18-02-2011, 07:45

Still the wrong way round.

Don't think 10mb are paying more per mb?

10mb = £21 = £2.10 per mb
30mb = £28.5 = £1.28 per mb
50mb = £35 = £0.70 per mb
100mb = £45 = £0.45 per mb.

10mb customers are paying three times more per mb than you are.

Early adopters may pay more for higher services but those higher services still cost far less per unit service than the existing slower services. Even when 50mb came out it was only £45, yet when compared to 10mb it should be over £100. 50mb has droppped a third off it's price whereas 10mb has had a price rise. Discounted up to the ying-yang my ass.

The vast majority of users are still on 10mb and the vast majority of them download less than 45GB a month, probably less than 10 on average. If 50mb was priced fairly you should be downloading no more than a 16GB a month download allowance on 50mb.

18-02-2011, 07:45	#123
qasdfdsaq cf.mega poster Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 11,207	Re: giganews (usenet) Still the wrong way round. Don't think 10mb are paying more per mb? 10mb = £21 = £2.10 per mb 30mb = £28.5 = £1.28 per mb 50mb = £35 = £0.70 per mb 100mb = £45 = £0.45 per mb. 10mb customers are paying three times more per mb than you are. Early adopters may pay more for higher services but those higher services still cost far less per unit service than the existing slower services. Even when 50mb came out it was only £45, yet when compared to 10mb it should be over £100. 50mb has droppped a third off it's price whereas 10mb has had a price rise. Discounted up to the ying-yang my ass. The vast majority of users are still on 10mb and the vast majority of them download less than 45GB a month, probably less than 10 on average. If 50mb was priced fairly you should be downloading no more than a 16GB a month download allowance on 50mb.