View Single Post
Old 17-02-2011, 23:09   #11
muppetman11
Inactive
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 12,313
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
Re: + Box fills faster with HD?

Quote:
Originally Posted by OLDGOLD View Post
Thanks muppetman. Mpeg4 and Mpeg2...I remember now lol. So does anyone know why VM don't use Mpeg4? Is it a cost thing? Or is it incompatible with their network etc? Or are they just stubborn lol?
Basically most of VM early STB weren't compatible however samsung v+hd , cisco vhd and TIVO are I think so maybe in the future they will look to change as it would save bandwith.
muppetman11 is offline   Reply With Quote