View Single Post
Old 17-02-2011, 22:47   #7
muppetman11
Inactive
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 12,313
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
Re: + Box fills faster with HD?

Quote:
Originally Posted by OLDGOLD View Post
I just recently switched from Sky+ HD and HD programs never used to take up anywhere near the amount of space that they do on V+. I think I've seen somewhere that VM use a different type of compression?? or video format?? to Sky, which is why there is a difference.

If that is the case, why don't VM start using the same compression or video format that Sky do? I appreciate TiVo is just around the corner, but even with a 1TB hard drive, the drive will still fill up quicker than if a better compression or video format was used (especially if it is as good as finding things for you to watch as the promos suggest).
Sky use Mpeg 4 were VM still use Mpeg 2 there are no differences to picture however your right mpeg4 is compressed more hence it doesn't take as much of your hard drive.
muppetman11 is offline   Reply With Quote