Thread: VM finally post news on bridge mode - superhub
View Single Post
Old 17-02-2011, 21:03   #71
Jon T
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Mansfield, Notts
Age: 46
Services: Virgin Media Telephone and 100Mb broadband, Sky Q
Posts: 1,994
Jon T has reached the bronze age
Jon T has reached the bronze ageJon T has reached the bronze ageJon T has reached the bronze ageJon T has reached the bronze ageJon T has reached the bronze ageJon T has reached the bronze ageJon T has reached the bronze ageJon T has reached the bronze ageJon T has reached the bronze ageJon T has reached the bronze ageJon T has reached the bronze ageJon T has reached the bronze ageJon T has reached the bronze ageJon T has reached the bronze ageJon T has reached the bronze ageJon T has reached the bronze ageJon T has reached the bronze ageJon T has reached the bronze ageJon T has reached the bronze age
Re: VM finally post news on bridge mode - superhub
Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq View Post
People think they cannot use their own router as this is in fact correct. The people who have actually used their own router as a router have had limited success and a number of problems. All of them who have shared there experiences here think it remains broken and are still asking for bridge mode.
Then all my posts have been missed then. I'm using a Superhub with a Linksys 320N. The Superhub us set to a subnet of 192.168.0/24, Linksys LAN side set to 192.168.1.0/24 subnet, WAN interface of the linksys is 192.168.0.2, with this address set as the DMZ IP on the Superhub.

As i've posted before on the forum, everything works fine, all portforwarding is done on the Linksys, bittorrent, FTP/HTTP servers etc, it all just works. Granted my experience may be a one off, it does work for me. An inspection of the routing tables on the Linksys confirm this. Yes the superhub is doing some routing by re-writing ethernet frame source IP addresses etc, but the Linksys is most certainly performing NAT/Firewall functions.
Jon T is offline   Reply With Quote