View Single Post
Old 17-02-2011, 19:46   #4
Lister of Smeg
Permanently Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 170
Lister of Smeg wont win a popularity contestLister of Smeg wont win a popularity contestLister of Smeg wont win a popularity contestLister of Smeg wont win a popularity contestLister of Smeg wont win a popularity contest
Re: Royal Navy Rescues Hostages From Pirates

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh View Post
Link

btw, you stated I think you can, and just have - I, of course, will apologise if you can show me a link to where the UK has given a Somali pirate a new council house and brought his family over*.


*(and of course, I don't mean the caveat-filled fiction from the Mail last year, which has enough "alluded to"/"believed"/"suspected"/"possibility"/"it is understood"/"seeking to discover"/"it is possible"/"quoted"/"claimed"/"is likely to be" to satisfy any lawyer.....)
As far as housing is concerned, if asylum seekers get to stay, they get free housing, if their application is turned down, they are not deported, instead, they get free accommodation until they are ready to move back.................................WHA... is what the High Court decided on the 9th of October 2003................So in many of the outskirts of major cities, there are new housing estates being built on tax payers money to house assylum seekers. One such estate in a city in Wales was built to house over 7000 Somalian refugees, this estate has caused many problems over the years to where non-somali people are too scared to enter this estate (it sounds like a movie rather than real life)

So tell me, is this right for us Brits? Too worried to wander around our homeland for fear of asylum seekers attacking us?

Asylum seekers who are in real danger should be allowed to come to Britain but leave when things have cooled over. However I don't believe that they should be allowed to come because they want to.

Asylum seekers get all they need to survive. They are already enough of a drain on this country. Native People of the UK desperate in need of housing, medical treatment and other important things can't have them because we put so much money towards asylum seekers. So these people should not be given bigger houses just because they decide their family is cramped in the free house they are given, what would they be living in back in their own Country.

Thousands of Eastern European "displaced persons" came to the UK in 1946 and 1947 seeking asylum. They lived in makeshift army camps and worked on farms for 2 years before being released into the community to find jobs and raise families. Genuine refugees will not object to refugee camps - any camp in the UK has to be better than death in the home country. Of course, economic migrants would resent being detained and having their bogus claims checked out.

These people scream and shout about their human rights being violated, but what about our human rights, surely the government are violating the human rights of ever British nationalist in the UK by allowing this charade to carry on?

Taxpayers pay £1,600-a-week for family of ex-asylum seekers to live in luxury five-storey home


Somali refugee given £2.1million taxpayer-funded house owed £7,000 in rent on previous home

Former asylum seeker on benefits given £2 million house

I work my arse off and can barely afford to rent a house for £500 a month + on top of that bills with a mate. I've paid into the system, do i get a free £1mil house?

PS Hugh, do you even work? Are you not upset by this? Your hard earned money goes on scrounging thugs like this?
Lister of Smeg is offline   Reply With Quote