View Single Post
Old 10-02-2011, 17:53   #44
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: sky movies (excess profits)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ahardie View Post
Having a friendly regulator? This is sheer fantasy.
I was referring to Ofcom who are clearly cable friendly - remind me again who referred this to the Competition Commission?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ahardie View Post
You you know fine well why VM have got out of the content busines it is because they cannot compete with Sky. I'm not looking for protection for VM anyway I'm looking for our interests to be protected and a monopoly is not in our interests.
I agree, so let's have 3rd parties getting access to VM's network so that those who are unable to receive reasonable broadband speeds from other operators have a choice of providers and altnets can use both VM's and BT's ducts to deliver fibre to premises and buildings.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote