View Single Post
Old 10-02-2011, 10:12   #14
mersey70
Inactive
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Wirral
Services: TV M, L BB, Sky+ HD
Posts: 1,485
mersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant future
Re: sky movies (excess profits)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ahardie View Post
Sky having a complete monopoly and charging too much for movies because of it isn't a good thing is it? Suggesting we customers shouldn't wish for something better is just what Sky wants.
In theory of course it isn't.

But exactly the same was said regarding Premier League football and all that happened was we had to subscribe to Sky and Setanta, and sadly it was later proven two separate services were unsustainable. People don't seem to want multiple subscriptions.

If you want yet more separate subscriptions that will probably cost more then support these moves to the hilt, that's your choice.

I would prefer for Sky's prices to be reviewed not so much their exclusivity, making them understand that exclusivity comes with responsibility. Having packages here, there and everywhere dosen't seem to benefit us financially.

Price regulation of movies might though.

In my opinion.
mersey70 is offline   Reply With Quote