View Single Post
Old 06-02-2011, 21:02   #14
Arthurgray50@blu
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,798
Arthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appeal
Arthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appeal
Re: Premier League TV football choice 'upheld' by EU advice

I think this is great news for the consumer, and that is the most important thing.

To me Sky and VM charge to much for the product of sport, l read somewhere that Sky charge £80.00 per month for Sport and Movies together, which is absurd.

Clubs won't suffer, as l am sure that other broadcastors will come in and offer there services, what has to happen is that the consumer has to choose, and they are the ones paying the bill.
Arthurgray50@blu is offline   Reply With Quote