View Single Post
Old 03-02-2011, 16:46   #20
alwaysabear
RIp Sweetness
 
alwaysabear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,393
alwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appeal
alwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appealalwaysabear has a bronzed appeal
Re: Disney-backed ESPN line up against Rupert Murdoch

Quote:
Originally Posted by pauldavies83 View Post
But if you support a team (as I'd guess most who subscribe to the pay-sports channels for football do) and want to watch their games, there is no guarantee which broadcaster would pick up your team's games - which kind of flaws the whole package system.

You would need to cover all the packages the way they currently stand to ensure you get all your teams games. So if a 3rd broadcaster picked up packages, you could find yourself needing to pay even more to ensure you see all your teams games.

I think the whole package system needs to be scrapped, and a better solution found.
I can understand what you saying ,but unless you support one of the big 5 its a bit of a lottery any way.

---------- Post added at 16:46 ---------- Previous post was at 16:44 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by muppetman11 View Post
Just imagine ESPNA HD and ESPN HD with 3 packages , it would be a big bye bye to Sky sports from me.
Lets not get to carried away now, but that would be great.
alwaysabear is offline   Reply With Quote