View Single Post
Old 31-01-2011, 23:01   #42
qasdfdsaq
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
Re: Upstream Traffic Management Trial 1st of February

Alright, I was generalizing a bit, and the data I quoted was from one particular manufacturer of traffic shaping/DPI equipment. In any case, the general consensus seems that "real time entertainment", i.e. streaming audio/video make up 40-60% according to all parties, fairly close to half of all internet traffic with some variation by region.

And P2P traffic, in the downstream, varies from the high single digits to low double digit range, which is fairly close to what I quoted anyway. Again patterns will vary by ISP and region, but shaping what takes up 10% of your bandwidth down to a maximum of 25% of bandwidth (well, with NNTP included) was never going to have much effect - that is of course if VM are actually doing it as they say they are.

Even in the upstream, if P2P is using ~35% overall and ~30% at peak times, capping it to 25% really won't reduce overall traffic by more than 10% if you look at it logically. We can pretty much ignore NNTP here since, well, there is negligible amounts of upstream NNTP on a home user's connection.
qasdfdsaq is offline   Reply With Quote