View Single Post
Old 17-01-2011, 01:15   #3
qasdfdsaq
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
Re: Wireless network needing more power - is Wireless N the solution?

Wireless N will not give you any more power, in fact it may output less. Power is limited by local regulations rather than wireless standards, the EU limit is 100mW on 2.4Ghz. You could get equipment 100x more powerful but they wouldn't be legal to buy or operate.

That said the average N device won't go much further than a good set of G equipment, but N does mandate minimum receive sensitivities (i.e. the weakest signal that can be used) to be at least as good as the best G equipment, so on average you might get a bit more range.

You'll probably see more variation between individual devices/models than between G and N as a whole.
qasdfdsaq is offline   Reply With Quote