View Single Post
Old 13-01-2011, 19:11   #44
mersey70
Inactive
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Wirral
Services: TV M, L BB, Sky+ HD
Posts: 1,485
mersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant future
Re: Were VM wrong to sell channels to Sky

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave42 View Post
i think sky are setting price too high so they know they dont have to give the channels and trying to get people to move to sky as they want a monolopy just IMO hope im wrong and some deals can be done would love to be able to have the channels

PS if goverment let murdoch have full control of sky it only gonna get worse
That is roughly my train of thought.

Let's be clear though, setting the price too high and withholding them are two completely different situations.

I can see no evidence whatsoever that Sky are actually withholding any of their basic channels and I base this on VM's own press release. If they don't fit in with VM's 'free HD' pricing structure then that again is a different matter altogether.

Maybe it's time for OFCOM to look at the pricing of the basic channels, maybe it's time for VM to reconsider their pricing structure. Maybe the deal is for the existing channels only.

I simply don't know.
mersey70 is offline   Reply With Quote