Thread: Were VM wrong to sell channels to Sky
View Single Post
Old 13-01-2011, 18:58   #43
Dave42
cf.mega poster
 
Dave42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Jarrow Tyne & Wear
Services: 360 box
Posts: 5,875
Dave42 is cast in bronzeDave42 is cast in bronzeDave42 is cast in bronzeDave42 is cast in bronze
Dave42 is cast in bronzeDave42 is cast in bronzeDave42 is cast in bronzeDave42 is cast in bronzeDave42 is cast in bronzeDave42 is cast in bronzeDave42 is cast in bronzeDave42 is cast in bronzeDave42 is cast in bronzeDave42 is cast in bronzeDave42 is cast in bronzeDave42 is cast in bronzeDave42 is cast in bronzeDave42 is cast in bronzeDave42 is cast in bronze
Re: Were VM wrong to sell channels to Sky
Quote:
Originally Posted by mersey70 View Post
Because SSP 3 & 4 HD are premium channels and were not part of OFCOMS consultation.

VM stated that they have access to ALL Sky's basic HD channels.

That's what is confusing, did it mean only existing channels or included an option to future launches.

I genuinely do not know. even DF didn't.
i think sky are setting price too high so they know they dont have to give the channels and trying to get people to move to sky as they want a monolopy just IMO hope im wrong and some deals can be done would love to be able to have the channels

PS if goverment let murdoch have full control of sky it only gonna get worse
Dave42 is offline   Reply With Quote