Thread: Were VM wrong to sell channels to Sky
View Single Post
Old 13-01-2011, 18:57   #42
muppetman11
Inactive
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 12,313
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Were VM wrong to sell channels to Sky
Quote:
Originally Posted by mersey70 View Post
Because SSP 3 & 4 HD are premium channels and were not part of OFCOMS consultation.

VM stated that they have access to ALL Sky's basic HD channels.

That's what is confusing, did it mean only existing channels or included an option to future launches.

I genuinely do not know. even DF didn't.
Agree they are premium channels however Sky definately withheld them or made them too expensive for a reason hence all the advertising watch all the sky sports channels in HD only on Sky.
muppetman11 is offline   Reply With Quote