View Single Post
Old 13-01-2011, 17:19   #26
mersey70
Inactive
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Wirral
Services: TV M, L BB, Sky+ HD
Posts: 1,485
mersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant future
Re: Were VM wrong to sell channels to Sky

Quote:
Originally Posted by Digital Fanatic View Post
As far as I know, VM have access to all Sky's basic channels. Now whether that was just at the time of the deal, I don't know.

The press release seemed to mean all Sky basic channels. Access to and VM wanting to pay the asking price are two different things though!
Exactly.

It would appear from that Press Release that Atlantic isn't being withheld. Unless the press release was just hot air, which I doubt. Let's be clear, around the sae time they actually announced Sky Arts HD was launching, ago, it still hasn't.

That is my point. If VM's 'free HD' pricing structure isn't compatible with offering these types of channels it isn't Sky's fault. What's the point of negotiating access to them if you can't afford to? I like the pricing structure but I am well aware of it shortcomings though. For me it's great but I don't want Atlantic.

Their own customers are expected to pay extra for it, in HD at least.

I think it is simply too expensive, we are not talking about some mickey mouse channel here but again I am assuming.
mersey70 is offline   Reply With Quote