View Single Post
Old 13-01-2011, 15:23   #9
mersey70
Inactive
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Wirral
Services: TV M, L BB, Sky+ HD
Posts: 1,485
mersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant futuremersey70 has a brilliant future
Re: Were VM wrong to sell channels to Sky

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wicked_and_Crazy View Post
i still believe that a company that owns channels should not be allowed to own a delivery mechanism. Regardless of whether your cable, satelite or freeview you should be able to subscribe to the same channels.
Does that apply to the BBC and ITV too?

They own Freesat.

And let's be clear here, Sky's platform is far less discriminatory than VM's who have complete and total control over who is broadcast on their network, less the must carry provisions of course.

I am not aqainist or in favour of the argument that a channel provider shouldn't own a platform but it must apply to everyone.

It was VM who wanted rid of VMtv which was a hangover from the Telewest days, the NTL side of the company never really bothered much channel wise.

Sky couldn't have bought it otherwise. Maybe we should be asking what they are going to sepnd the money on.
mersey70 is offline   Reply With Quote