View Single Post
Old 29-12-2010, 21:35   #32
muppetman11
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 12,313
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Sky Atlantic on Virgin Media

Quote:
Originally Posted by mersey70 View Post
And will pay for it too, around 3 million I think.

You are right a mix of on demand and linear HD would be perfect which is what we get now to some extent but I have absolutely no doubt most new subscribers would be attracted to HD linear channels over on demand.
I've constantly said it on here VM need more HD channels for there TV service to really take off , TIVO looks great but what goods great hardware if you can't watch your favourite HD channel. I would rather VM added a £5.00 HD sub for extra channels if it meant we got more quality and choice. I'm not knocking VM they've made a great start but there's plenty more to be done.
muppetman11 is offline   Reply With Quote