View Single Post
Old 24-12-2010, 13:16   #1081
Flyboy
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,375
Flyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful one
Re: Students Rioting in London.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek View Post
Quite simply the Police have far more important things to deal with than an old sticker on a rarely used vehicle. Plenty of forces who assist the met with mutual aid have their own unofficial sticker on their riot vans that seem to last through services without being removed.
Do they keep of a stock of knackered vans to police demonstrations? Would they use vans that had not passed the safety tests, for example?

Quote:
I give up. Instead I'll just admit that the van, which we have already demonstrated had a valid number plate, was being driven, and is of a similar age to other vans used by the Met in London didn't have a valid tax disc but instead they decided to put a small red sticker, almost exactly the same size as a tax disc, in the same place a tax disc is stuck and no-one has picked up that it wasn't actually a RFL.
It has not been established either way whether the van had number plates, but it doesn't make any difference. If there is an RFL on the van, what was the expiry date.

Quote:
Well when they are PERSONAL ISSUE (i.e. each cop has their own, with their own ID on it) then yes it would be too much trouble to leave it in a van.
So, there exactly the same number of helmets as there are officers, there are no spares, no training gear, no old ones from officers who have left the service (or do they get to keep them?)?

When did I "deny there was anything in the van?"
Flyboy is offline   Reply With Quote