View Single Post
Old 17-12-2010, 13:59   #9
muppetman11
Inactive
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 12,313
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Ofcom investigates Virgin and BT complaints over Sky Sports

Quote:
Originally Posted by pauldavies83 View Post
Maybe while they are moaning to ofcom (with good reason!) they should ask them why they decided to bottle their decisions earlier in the year, and keep HD3/4 out of the must-offer?

And why movies weren't included, as Sky still have a monopolistic grip on first-run pay-TV movies.

I'd be very happy to see an end of the draconian per-device charge. VM obviously don't want to charge it, and it will be a good day for everyone when it's gone. A HD multiroom box on Sky costs £20p/m because of it!
Well said mate , it's about time Sky was made to split in two Content provider and platform.

---------- Post added at 14:57 ---------- Previous post was at 14:54 ----------

How is it competitive to have one platform only showing Sky Sports 3 and 4 HD ? Baffles me.

---------- Post added at 14:59 ---------- Previous post was at 14:57 ----------

You can see Murdochs evil empire getting the nod to buy the rest of Sky , God listen me rant LOL :-)
muppetman11 is offline   Reply With Quote