View Single Post
Old 15-12-2010, 19:39   #724
Flyboy
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,375
Flyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful one
Re: Students Rioting in London.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ View Post
Yeah I'd love to.

Why, it would be nothing to do with them, he is agrwon man and can, beleive it or not, make his own decisons. I am sure you wouldn't ask them if he takes sugar.

OK let me ask you another way. Would you be in favour of his actions?
It would depend on how he sees his actions justifying the ends. I wouldn't be happy with him putting himself in harms way, what parent wouldn't, I most certainly would not be happy with him attempting to lie or to deceive, regardless of the methods he uses. But there would be nothing I could do to stop him.

---------- Post added at 20:39 ---------- Previous post was at 20:35 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh View Post
I think before we go any further in this line of debate we should draw a distinction between garnering sympathy for a cause lets say blindness ,many people ,including a past home secratary have used there blindness to campaigne or raise funds, perfectly proper and correct imo .But this individual is imo using his disability to obstruct the police ,place them in danger and slander their good name .There is a big difference between the two
A good point, but where do we make the distinction between what is and what isn't justified? Whilst I agree, he should not lie or deceive to the extent to which you are suggesting he is, there may be times when using his attributes come in handy when bringing home a justified point.
Flyboy is offline   Reply With Quote