View Single Post
Old 15-12-2010, 17:20   #108
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Terrible performance Leicester (LE3)

Nah SSH feels nasty with packet loss, that would have been something else, some load variation or congestion on downstream more than upstream.

Accompanying the low latency is packet loss, most things wouldn't feel snappier, SSH would suck, browsing feel nasty but bulk downloading would feel be better.

Interactive protocols suck mightily regardless of the queueing system when upstream is sufficiently congested.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote