View Single Post
Old 11-12-2010, 16:09   #38
Chris
Trollsplatter
Cable Forum Team
 
Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North of Watford
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 38,383
Chris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden aura
Chris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden aura
Re: Katie Price complains to Ofcom over Frankie Boyle gag

Quote:
Originally Posted by punky View Post
Not with regards to causing offense. There is no concrete definition of what "offence" is. It's something that every individual person sets the boundary of. A couple of hundred years ago taking the lord's name in vain was offensive. To a tiny minority it still is. Same with insulting royals. How can people be held account to something that's impossible to define?
On the contrary, I think communities of people are entirely capable of agreeing amongst themselves that they consider certain words, sentiments or activities to be offensive and to seek to exclude such behaviour from within the community.

To take your example of blasphemy: would you consider it acceptable for someone visiting a cathedral, abbey or any other Christian institution that is normally open to the public (say for example the monastery at Buckfast Abbey in Devon) to arrive with a small group of friends and then stand up and deliver a lecture on the folly of religion?
Chris is offline   Reply With Quote